What's new

"Now Showing"

kimahri said:
Ratatouille.

<3

Seconded. I saw it less that three times as well today.

It's awesome. Just look at the level of detail in these movies. How long it took to model that kitchen. The reflection of a spoon hanging in the background for three and a half second, someone have actually spent time tweaking so that reflection is just right. Someone have sit there, making the movements of the rat fur look natural in the rain.
And some guys have been paid for going to Paris and taking thousands of pictures.

My only beef with this movie: Every time you see the view out of a window, you can see the Eiffel Tower. According to American films, the Tower can be seen from every window in the city.
 
Ben said:
furie said:
(shows much more acting potential here than in the cruddy B:TDK)

UGH. Since you can't get the name of it right, you don't get to be critical of it :wink:

If the film deserved the attention, I'd get it right ;)

Also

IMDB said:
aka Batman: The Dark Knight (USA: informal title)

The only formal thing this needs is formal recognise of over-hype! :p
 
furie said:
IMDB said:
aka Batman: The Dark Knight (USA: informal title)

The only formal thing this needs is formal recognise of over-hype! :p

This, good chap, is England :wink:

A country with at least one more person who isn't allowed film opinions now :p

On the topic, I watched Eternal Sunshine last night for the first time. What a tripe piece of crap it was. I love surrealism, and the writer has made gold (Being John Malkovich), but, really... this was just terrible. Arty for the sake of being arty, and with actors who can't act (Kate Winslet NEEDS to die, and WTF, Kirsten Dunst?!?! My left foot can act better than her AND it's more attractive), and a story that just plods to nothing... Yeah, winning combination. Tedious, dull and bland - boo. 4/10. It sent me to sleep.
 
Ben said:
A country with at least one more person who isn't allowed film opinions now :p

Excellent, you just go ahead and share you excellent film tastes and opinions with... Taylor! I'd be so proud of myself :p
 
Taylor said:
^ Ewww, Kate Winslet! I think she's so ugly, actually.

Then Ben said:
^Yep, she also looks like my foot.

Next time I see you, just ignore me as I do strange things to your foot.

Although she has gone off the boil in recent years. When she won that Oscar, she suddenly become a lovey bint, but I stillw ould. So yeah, as she's now off the boil, slagging off Winslet is no longer a banable offense.
 
tks said:
I thought she was quite hot in the Reader, although that might just be my Nazi fetish....

We've got that at the moment actually. Another of Madame_Furie's barely disguised soft porn films :p

I don't think I'm going to watch it though, despite Winslet soft-pornage.
 
Last night I saw the opportunity to watch 2 films.


First one was Training Day.
Okay, I don't mind Denzel Washington, he can be a good actor. Put him alongside a wannabe action hero like Ethan Hawke though and it becomes a little morbid. I was overall dissapointed with this film, afterall it is apparently well known and popular with many critics.

Set in some ghetto-like streets of LA, the producer has gone for a gritty storyline about a smalltime cop training to be a narcotics officer with a seemingly experienced officer (Washington). There seems to be a lot of coincidental happenings in this film which in reality would just never cut it.
Washington does a good job as some sort of headcase cop, who funnily enough isn't actually evil (although there are times I do wonder). Ethan Hawke on the otherhand just irritates the hell out of me. The storyline knocks my concentration for 6, I just don't seem to care because its all a little predictable the more you watch.

5/10

(Some good bits, then many boring bits with a bonus prize of Ethan Hawke)


My second film was Righteous Kill.

Oh, what could have been.
Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino side by side. Powerful stuff.
Not.
2 of the most inspiring and powerful actors ever thrown into this casserole of epic fail. I actually could have cried as Deniro and Pacino's dignity died a 1 and a half hour death. The film just totally lost me, 2 cops frame an innocent guy for something, a chunk of crap, some murders, some more crap, then the predictable finale.
The cameramen seemed half drunk too, I mean the camera was a slurry mess everytime they tried to get a close up of Pacino's face. Constantly out of focus too. The rest of the cast were pretty much nobodys, I mean it got to the point where I could feel their eyes reading directly off a script.

Totally and utterly absurd, a real wtf? kind of film.

3/10
 
Haha, this could get you banned, y'know.

She is just SUCH a plain Jane. Like, she looks pretty in SOME pictures, like this:

http://www.jewishjournal.com/images/blo ... 120122.jpg

But in her movies, like Titanic, and in ninety percent of other pictures, like these:

http://blog.endeavorprep.com/wp-content ... imeinc.jpg

http://www.solarnavigator.net/films_mov ... _denim.jpg

http://tnaron.files.wordpress.com/2009/ ... inslet.jpg

She really does look like Ben's foot. Unless Ben's foot is sexy.
 
Saw Transformers: Revenge of the fallen Sunday night with the brother.

Ugh...where to begin...

The only real good thing is the effects. The transforming is cool, as in the first, but it doesn't have the same "OH DEAR GOD IT'S A ROBOT NOW" as in the first one. And speaking of the transformers, yes there are new ones. But anyone remember their names? Anyone? I only remember the Corvette being called sideswipe once in the beginning. No names for the motorcycles, no names for the twins (besides "mudflap", but I'm not sure if that's a name...). So, without names, you really couldn't give a crap.

Story was...gone. There was a story, I think. It's hard to remember. Something about a thingy doing something. They mostly have fight scenes over story and plot...which isn't good. I'm also noticing that the two main character (Don't ask me their names, not the slightest clue) didn't really "develop" or even change at all.

Overall, it's very disappointing. Just a lot of shiny exposions and firey cars.

3/10
 
Prince Caspian:
Really good film actually. Some really good fight scenes as well although they feel totally fake as there isn't a single drop of blood. I mean, who can get their head cut of without bleeding? And all the swords and weapons stay shiny and clean throughout the whole thing. I know it's a childrens film but with some of the other things they show in this film I'm sure they can get away with a tiny bit of blood.
That aside though it's a very good film. I haven't read the book so can't compare it to it but on it's own it's got good characters and story and the visual effects are STUNNING! Usually I hate it when films use loads of CGI but here it all fits in together and looks very clear and realistic.
Easily as good as the first film and better in quite a few scenes.
8/10
 
^Yay, someone else who likes Caspian :D


Just got back from seeing Public Enemies at the cinema.

Umm, there are way too many bad things about this film, I have a feeling I might forget one or two of them but I'll try to list all of them:

- Marion Cotillard is well underused
- Shaky cam is constantly used which means it makes it hard to understand what is actually going on
- Nothing is really explained and the 'story' just jumps around like a headless kangaroo
- I wanted to know what the time was which is always a clear sign the film is terrible

+ Christian Bale doesn't do much

Rating: 2/5
 
^ Spot on there peep, especially regarding the shaky cam. I nearly threw up during the gun fight in the woods.
 
4 more films that I should rate. Not going to write a lot

My Cousin Vinny

Joe Pesci does a fantastic job keeping this sharp comedy alive. Some bits get sloppy but all in all a very entertaining comedy.

7.5/10

Year One

A terrible American comedy which fails at getting any laughs from me. There is so much that could be humoured from such a historic angle, but typically it's ignored and replaced with childish slapstick.

3.0/10

The Sting

Cunning film about a trickster who pulls off a huge con. Nicely set in the 1920's, but the storyline lead me into a little bit of confusion. However the film was pretty entertaining.

7.2/10

Philadelphia

Great cutting-edge film which stars Tom Hanks as an AIDS victim who pursues justice after being unfairly sacked from his job as an eternee. Film based upon discrimination, and Hanks works well alongside Denzel Washington. There are a few random scenes in this film where you think ''wtf?'' but aside from that, it's great!

7.8/10
 
So wrong! The Sting is a top film! Brilliant from end to end. The acting, story, direction - it's all fantastic.

A film well ahead of its time in terms of all of the above. Just superb entertainment. I don't know what was confusing about the plot?
 
Well I sort of nodded off at points, so I woke up unaware of what happened!

Although that sounds unfair, I must stick to my judgements :p
The female assassain boosted my votes, it was such an unpredictable peak of the film!
 
Top