What's new

What parks do you have zero desire to revisit?

Hixee

Flojector
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Social Media Team
Universal Studios Hollywood: Overpriced, too many simulator rides, I'd rather go to Disney than here.
I agree. I mean, I'm glad I did the park, and did really enjoy the Harry Potter area, Kung Fu Panda, Waterworld and the Studio Tour, but I can't say I'd ever be rushing back there.

They are building a Jurassic Park water ride, but I think they're going to need another three or four non-sim based rides to round it out a bit. By the end, we were a bit fed up of them, to be honest!
 

gavin

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Social Media Team
I agree. I mean, I'm glad I did the park, and did really enjoy the Harry Potter area, Kung Fu Panda, Waterworld and the Studio Tour, but I can't say I'd ever be rushing back there.

They are building a Jurassic Park water ride, but I think they're going to need another three or four non-sim based rides to round it out a bit. By the end, we were a bit fed up of them, to be honest!
They're not building a new ride. They have Jurassic Park already. They're just updating/retheming it to Jurassic World.

I kind of agree with that park though. It's my least favourite of the Universal parks.

The vast majority of Chinese parks don't really deserve a revisit to be honest. Luckily, since most of them don't tend to add new stuff, it's not an issue. The standouts of the major parks that I wouldn't visit again are Quancheng Euro Park (hated it), and Joyland.
 

cookie

Giga Poster
I think, out of all the parks I could reasonably get to, none are in the "never want to revisit" category, but some are in the "highly unlikely I'll revisit."

One for me would be Kolmården. Now, don't get me wrong, nothing's wrong with the park, and Wildfire is amazing, but... for one, its location is really awkwardly off the beaten path, and second, even if Wildfire's amazing... that's about it in terms of things that would draw a ride enthusiast. The animals I can see elsewhere and the rest of the small number of attractions are bog-standard family rides you find in most parks. I think if they try to develop the place with more thrill rides it would be worth a revisit, but given the headaches it took to make sure Wildfire could even stay on the property I don't know if they want to risk going through that again.

And when Liseberg and Gröna Lund exist with the ride selections that they have and being so easy to get to... Yeah. Kolmården really feels like a one-and-done in comparison.
 
Last edited:

GeaugaLakeisAlive

Roller Poster
It's likely a safe bet that there are many parks out there where virtually every enthusiast wants to revisit. I'd imagine the mega parks, like Cedar Point, Six Flags Magic Mountain or Great Adventure, Phantasialand, or Nagashima Spaland are at the tops of everybody's lists. Maybe some people have a soft spot for the small park they grew up at, like Seabreeze or Lake Winnie. Whether the park is building a brand spanking new B&M, you're visiting for nostalgia sake, or you've grown up and it's time to introduce your kids to coasters, you're going back for another visit.

I recently concluded a road trip with a series of parks that I would love to visit again sometime in the future but I also visited a few parks where the likelihood of going back is slim to none. What are your parks that you don't see yourself ever revisiting?

Now before I list my own parks, I do want to clarify that this is a snapshot in time activity. There is the (slim) possibility that a park like Six Flags America gets cleaned up and a bunch of investment gets dumped into it, ultimately leaving it as a park worth visiting. Probably not...but I guess it IS possible. So let's just lay this one sort of ground rule for this thought exercise: the park's chances of building something major (like a RMC anything or B&M hyper) - something that would draw you back - are slim to none.


Zero desire whatsoever:
  • Tibidabo - good view but a pain to get to
  • Beech Bend - it was pretty trashy
  • Buffalo Bill's Resort - how is Desperado still existing? Actually...all of the Las Vegas rides...too expensive for what they are.
  • Conneaut Lake Park - It wasn't quite as bad as I thought it'd be, but it's still pretty bad
  • Fantasy Island - Silver Comet was slightly disappointing
  • Fun Forest - This place might not even exist
  • The Great Escape - Comet is the only redeeming quality of the park and it's not worth traveling an hour minimum out of the way
  • Santa Monica Pier - There isn't room for anything new
  • Stricker's Grove - their operating schedule really makes visiting difficult
  • Sylvan Beach - I probably contracted some disease there

More likely to add something major, but I won't visit otherwise even if I'm passing by:
  • La Ronde - It's REALLY far out of the way
  • Lakemont Park - we'll see what happens with the renovation. Leap the Dips was fun but I'm not dying to return when Hersheypark is down the road.
  • Palace Playland - it depends on who I'm with - I'll stop in with fellow enthusiasts who need the quick +3 before/after Funtown.
  • Six Flags America - I REALLY don't want to go back, but I would make a pit stop for something major.
  • Six Flags St Louis - It doesn't seem like they're doing a whole lot with this park - I'll gladly pass it up for bigger and better things.
Six Flags St. Louis: Mr. Freeze was the only worthwhile coaster there and it has a clone. I'm never going back unlis RMC Boss happens
 
Top