TheFlyerMan1
Roller Poster
I appreciate your certainty about the possibility it's a Mack Spinner, but you have no evidence. Stuff gets leaked all the time, why should this be an exception?I'll be glad to take that bet.
I appreciate your certainty about the possibility it's a Mack Spinner, but you have no evidence. Stuff gets leaked all the time, why should this be an exception?I'll be glad to take that bet.
I appreciate your certainty about the possibility it's a Mack Spinner, but you have no evidence. Stuff gets leaked all the time, why should this be an exception?
Swoosh has been consistent all along, talking about a custom Mack.Swoosh, you tried to correct me on my post about a Mack Extreme Spinner and now you're saying it isn't one? :emoji_zipper_mouth: off.
What's that got to do with anything? I'm aiming this at the fact Swoosh was trying to correct me about it being a potential Mack Xtreme Spinner by quoting my dialogue with another member, so, yeah.Swoosh has been consistent all along, talking about a custom Mack.
Swoosh, you tried to correct me on my post about a Mack Extreme Spinner and now you're saying it isn't one? :emoji_zipper_mouth: off.
He said that he thinks it won't be the IAAPA model, as this quote shows...I only stated you were incorrect on this being a standard model which you for some reason felt the need to keep droning on about.
He's saying that a company, despite having the resources and money, won't immediately go for a custom layout to a new model. If a layout was shown at IAAPA, chances are that a company would buy that one first instead of a custom one. Yes, this project is probably not the model shown at IAAPA, but the comment was not saying that it WILL be a Mack Xtreme Spinner, but rather IF they got one. Like you said, they probably won't, but IF they got one, they'd probably go for the shown model, not a custom one. If Mack already has a model out there, why waste resources trying to work the same system into a new layout? especially if it uses the terrain?I don't doubt it, at all in fact.