Lofty
CF Legend
Re: Parque de Atracciones de Madrid | Family coaster?
Just let it go. You've kind of been proven wrong. It's an Attraction, leave it.CoasterCrazy said:But does an average family attraction like this really attract that many people opposed to a major coaster? Given, it will attract some people...
The GP are going to say...
"Did you know that they have a 200ft coaster in which you go upside down at the top (Abismo)? In addition, they have a pint - sized family coaster that looks quite fun..."
(In GP words)
Rather than being attracted to the family coaster. Do you get me?
Time to stop this arguing...
The name is: Tren de la Mina (If you don't know already)
Which means "mine train" in spanish. Fairly obvious, but decent name.
Words of wisdom, hopeful you'll be able to stop this..UC said:TL;DR: CoasterCrazy is right in terms of the marketing power of big rides, but lofty is right in terms of how a proper balance is definitely needed, and rides like this are certainly justified.
-------------------
Family rides, unless they're massive/innovative/at Disney or whatever, never generally have the marketing power that large rides do, but it's something a successful park must always pay attention to.
If you let it go for too long (i.e. SFMM) you risk alienating a decent size of the market, as well as "training" your fan base to expect big rides every year (again, SFMM). It gets to the point where it isn't cost effective to add another major ride every year, but by not doing so, you lose a sizable chunk of your patrons.
Think of it this way - big rides are always going to attract the types that come to ride the new big ride, and don't care much about anything else. Families are going to visit no matter what because it's something to do with their families, and they don't care as much if something is new or not as long as everyone has fun. When you alienate the families, you're left with that "NEW OR NOTHING!" group, who simply won't visit as soon as your capital starts to dry up. Yes, there is that middle group that will visit occasionally regardless, do the big rides, and leave - but it's not usually large enough to support the justification of newer rides so often, which means your patronage slowly dies out.
This is why dedicated thrill parks tend to die out after a few years once they stop adding major attractions (SFMM, before their "clean-it-up" realization), and why family-based parks (such as those at WDW) can survive for many years despite barely changing at all. This becomes even more impressive when you consider that a large part of Disney's patronage are passholders, who have visited the same attractions for many, many years.
So yes, while bigger rides are easier to market, it's the family rides that tend to create the most repeat customers and maintain a park's patronage without having to expend a ton of money.