Lofty said:They look a bit more comfortable than the Skyrush ones...
There's Intamin AG, which is a huge company that is split into two divisions - Intamin Amusements and Intamin Transport. Intamin Transport makes monorails for different cities, and Intamin Amusements is split into different subdivisions. There is Intamin Europe, which is responsible for all European transactions (obviously). There's Intamin North America, which handles transactions across the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Intaride is a separate division of Intamin which works mostly with Intamin North America to design roller coasters.Screaming Coasters said:^ Hang on... What??
Inatmin Ride Trade and Intamin are two separate entities?
I don't get it...
I just wanna see an article or a product press release where it states that they were designed by someone else.
Screaming Coasters said:Why do they not share the same technology in that case?
furie said:The fact the Skyrush restraints/seats were pretty much a failure* probably prompted a redesign.
Screaming Coasters said:^ Yeah, thats what I thought the setup would be too. I mean, why would the same company design two separate things? It seems a bit dumb and financially unviable..
EDIT:
I've just researched and IntaRide, or as we commonly know it, Intamin Ride Trade. IntaRide is just a broker and constructer that carries the Inatmin AG brand. The technology still comes from the Swiss plant and the other subdivisions facilitate the manufacturing.
Vekoma also do this and so do B&M and I imagine that a lot of mainstream manufacturers do this. Engineer in one place and facilitate at the others.
spicy said:Seems like a very strange way to operate?
Why have separately functioning design firms and not just one?