Not really. Most of the others have the benefit of, you know, being complete.Taxi said:Already giving the other winged coasters a run for their money....
Ethan said:^ Skyrush isn't a winged coaster, it's a Wing Rider. They made by different companies and look completely different to these wing coasters.
Taxi said:Tomato Tamata.....
http://www.intaminworldwide.com/amu...mber/Wing+Coaster/language/de-DE/Default.aspx
Intamin Wing Coaster
http://www.bolliger-mabillard.com/products/wing_en.aspx
B&M Wing Coaster
Not quite identical. Baco is really ****.Antinos said:For those who are anal about terminology, this is a B&M wing coaster. Furious Baco is an Intamin wing rider. Skyrush is an Intamin wing coaster. This and Baco are the identical products
Hixee said:Not quite identical. Baco is really ****.Antinos said:For those who are anal about terminology, this is a B&M wing coaster. Furious Baco is an Intamin wing rider. Skyrush is an Intamin wing coaster. This and Baco are the identical products
Intricks said:
In the parking lot of the Bay Harbor dining place. The odd line you vaguely see coming up at an angle in the center of the photo is Gaterkeepers lift hill.
Yes, it will be necessary, they wouldn't waste that much metal if it wasn't necessary.BBH said:Is there really a need for a single-columned support right after the main one? What happened to Mother Necessity?
Not to mention it being Cedar Point. Home of the "My cock is bigger than yours" mentality.spicy said:That's just so awesome..
It's just like the good old days, an American park will just build the biggest version possible of a coaster and make all the others look small :lol:
Absolutely. Supports aren't put in 'just-in-case' as they're pretty expensive. This one will be necessary. Smithy's probably roughly right:Lofty said:Yes, it will be necessary, they wouldn't waste that much metal if it wasn't necessary.BBH said:Is there really a need for a single-columned support right after the main one? What happened to Mother Necessity?
With one thing to add. This is going to be the point where the whole weight of the train begins to force into the pull-out. Above that there's significant hangtime as the train accelerates, but where that single support is is just about where the full force of the pull-out starts to kick in. It's absolutely needed, that we can be sure of.Smithy said:I'm fairly sure it is a necessity, can't see why else it would be there. Probably takes some of the strain off the two supports either side of it, especially as that seems like a bit of a stress poin where the track will flex