I have my doubts that this coaster will ever be build. And I'm actually not so sure if this is so bad. Well, of course that 355 ft spike would be great but other than that the layout (at least as it is reconstructed by BGWFans) is not that convincing.
If the orientation of the train is as assumed in the BWGFans video you ride the main drop backwards. That's for sure an interesting experience but if I'd have to make a choice I'd clearly would prefer a forward drop where I can see the height. On the other hand, if the orientation would be such that you drop forward, you are pushed through the main launches backwards which, again, would not be my first choice (backward launch is a nice effect but I'd prefer the main launch to be forward).
There's yet another thing that is non-optimal as far as I can see. If the coaster really needs that second launch just before the big spike in order to climb it, then on the way back you either have that break directly after the drop (which is kind of awful) or (if the launch does not function as a break) you pass the banked turn with a fairly different speed than on the way there. That means one way would feel either forceless or over the edge (in any case the laterals would not work out properly, which is typically not what you want for such a banked turn). And as the layout does not contain that much more, this would concern a significant part of the ride.