The Peak District is too far north of Alton to be relevent to the point being made. The point was that people, because of visiting Alton Towers, discover things about the surounding area and contribute to it's tourism. (Since you were so offended by me shouting at you to make sure you didn't miss the point, here I underlined it in a patronising manner. Hope that's better.) This is an undeniable fact. I would not consider the Peak District to be the local area, maybe I'm alone in this thought? But If I'm not, then the area is indeed known for Alton Towers alone. My point is that most visitors coming to Alton do not come anywhere near Peak District or any signs towards it, so it cannot be that local (or important). The town of Alton, it's businesses and it's residence that benefit from Alton Towers, which is why Pierre made the comment. These businesses (pubs, B&Bs, etc) wouldn't get half as much income, or even exist, without the towers. People wouldn't stay in Alton to go to the Peak District. Do you understand why the Peak District is irelevent?