Europa Park was also against inversions and yet they built Blue Fire. Things change.I thought Toverland were against inverting coasters?
Europa also aren't aiming their main clientele at younger audiences. Less of the sass.Europa Park was also against inversions and yet they built Blue Fire. Things change.
Yes they were aiming for younger audiences but maybe they want to change that, that's what I'm talking about. Sometimes families have younger children and teenagers, an intense coaster would draw more of these into the park. It looks like they want to expand their target group. That's why it's not surprising for me. They already have a lot for younger audiences so they can now also start to look at teenagers and above.Europa also aren't aiming their main clientele at younger audiences. Less of the sass.
But he is half right.Europa also aren't aiming their main clientele at younger audiences. Less of the sass.
This is prettycolors: light blue track, brown supports
Ah yes, forgot about that one. Apart from that they are all around the 1.4M/54 Inch mark though, so when they focus on the teens with a B&M, they probably will give teens the thrill of inversions.DelPiero, there's the kiddie invert in China that's got a small height restriction. Don't some of the American ones end up being like 1.37m when converted from inches?
I judge any new installation in two ways nowadays. 1 - Am I personally excited by it and would I want to make plans just for that new ride? and 2 - Does it excite me from a family perspective?I think that layout looks fun and y'all need to stop bitching when :emoji_zipper_mouth:ing Toverland get a B&M.
Just out of curiosity, what's the authenticity of the original layout?
The thing is, kids tend to grow up. If you want to keep your clients, It might be smart to grow with them.Europa also aren't aiming their main clientele at younger audiences. Less of the sass.
OzIris has a height restriction of 1.3m.Are there any B&Ms with a lower height restriction than 1.4M?