And... here he is!Jack Silkstone right now
Woah, one quarter of the total track length in one delivery! Awesome!Seems like 4 pieces of Exodus track arrived at Thorpe today.
No doubt the next coaster at BPB will be rose gold with faux diamonds embedded into it.This golden track has AMANDA THOMPSON written all over it. I bet she now is regretting not painting Icon's track this colour.
^Also to note; 90% of the footers are now in place and Jack confirmed the supports at the far end of the site will go in first (the massive outerbank inversion thing). Doesn't seem like the construction crane is on site yet though.
My guess is we will see the two support towers constructed first and then the track afterwards, but I'm curious if we will see both towers go up simultaneously or if they'll finish one and then start the second, followed by the track. Either way, I'm way too excited right now!
The dive loop stall probably takes the title because this only really inverts at about 3/4 the height of the outerbank.Do we know the height of this inversion?
Could it be taller than The Odyssey's 124ft loop making it the tallest inversion in the UK?
however we could argue that the point in which the outerbank becomes beyond 135° counts and not just the *most* inverted point, then things get a bit trickier. I personally think that point rests somewhere between the two lines, so I think the dive loop is taller.
I think furie's inversion chart is a bit of an outdated definition personally (no offence of course) and prefer RCDB's logic in this instance, as iirc furie puts the inversion threshold at 160° whereas I would consider an inversion anything closer to 180° than 90°, so over 135°. I mean it's subjective at the end of the day but I think RCDB's approach is more logical.This sounds like one for Furie's old inversion chart
I would consider an inversion anything where your feet are well above your head. So in my opinion an inversion is something at or above 135 degrees.I don't personally agree with furie's inversion chart and prefer RCDB's logic in this instance, as iirc furie puts the inversion threshold at 160° whereas I would consider an inversion anything closer to 180° than 90°, so over 135°. I mean it's subjective at the end of the day but I think RCDB's approach is more logical.
Do we know the height of this inversion?
Could it be taller than The Odyssey's 124ft loop making it the tallest inversion in the UK?