I have been very busy the last couple of weeks and had kept meaning to respond to stuff in this thread but never got round to it. Anyways, enjoy me rambling on about discussion points from the month that have long since stopped...
Think we are still looking at a 2024 opening?
Now this is the interesting question.
The original plans, and even the consultation, never stated an opening date, or even a year. But it was clear from context, and some labels, that it would open in 2024. When it 2024 is not clear, especially since many major investments in recent years at Merlin have been scheduled to open in May, rather than March.
But what we do know is that the park had hoped that planning would be approved in Summer of this year, and construction start in November. And that the park had closed Old Town this year so they could do preliminary work in the area before November.
Now it's unclear whether the park did all the preliminary work they planned to do in the Old Town area as a result of the confusion over whether planning would be accepted. But it's, if nothing else, curious, that the park reopened at area for Fright Nights when that wasn't the original plan. So maybe they didn't do all the preliminary work that was planned, which could delay the construction start date.
There's also the bigger issue about how much the planning acceptance delay and confusion has caused problems with the contracting process. Is there a delay to getting in construction equipment now? Signing off things with Mack? Who knows.
Now here's the thing. Say Exodus was planned to open in May 2024, with construction due to start in November 2022. If construction now starts in January 2023, logically that pushes opening back to July 2024. Now say construction gets hit by any sort of unexpected delay, and you then hit August 2024 at the earliest. At what point do the park draw a line and say "We shouldn't open a new ride this late into our season", and then go for a 2025 opening? Or do they just go for the "Let's open it asap, even if it harm the early part of season" logic? There's lots to think about either side of that argument.
Obviously if the intention was to open in March 2024, this is less of an issue. But still a potential issue.
So tl;dr - it's not clear whether this will be 2024 or 2025 opening right now. An optimist would certainly still say 2024. A realist would say we don't know just yet.
So, there’s nothing here that isn’t already probably on the designers’ radars. None are likely to cause any major issues, but it’s hard to say without knowing what they’ll find in the ground or what they might run up against as part of the design process. In general, I don't think any of these things will be insurmountable, but don't hold me to that.
[/B][/U]
Think this post hit the nail on the head. All of those conditions are very standard and have appeared in similarly sized applications of Thorpe's to my understanding. A good planning team will have taken these into account in terms of scheduling and any potential delays too I'd say.
And the noise testing would maybe have been done in Belgium not Turkey, as the ride types need to be as similar as possible.
Not exactly the case. The sound tests were primarily for the lift hill mechanism. So it makes more sense to compare to a ride with a lift hill than a launch, even if the trains are different (as the resulting sounds from trains aren't *that* different).
Equally though, I think it's highly unlikely that this will feature spinning cars.
I thought it was because nobody wanted to fork out for the water treatment stuff needed by the EU on new water rides? If so, maybe we'll get a new one after next December if they go through with scrapping EU regulations
I don’t think the cost of water treatment is necessarily the issue… correct me if I’m wrong here, but I think Tidal Wave at Thorpe may have been built after the water treatment legislation on water rides came into force. As was Drenched at Oakwood. And while they aren’t quite the same, splash battles like Battle Galleons would also have been built after this.
I think that it’s simply down to cost vs benefit. Water rides probably cost more money these days what with the substantially more advanced safety systems required (water rides seem to have been a couple of decades behind things like coasters in that regard), and we don’t really have a climate that suits water rides. If a park builds one as a major investment, it probably wouldn’t get an awful lot of popularity outside of a select few hot days each year. As an example, look at something like Battle Galleons at Alton Towers. I’ve been to Towers countless times over the years, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen it with a queue. Heck, even from observing RideTimes when I’m not there, I’ve only ever seen it with a queue on the very hot days. Ditto with something like Tidal Wave; I’ve only ever seen that attract significant popularity on hot days.
The following is only what I've pieced together and could be very much wrong. It doesn't really address either of the above posts, more just adding to the discussion. But away we go...
Yes, new water rides built need to have some sort of water treatment system in place (said very hand wavily, as I don't know what sort of stuff is needed). I don't know when that was put in place. But, importantly, when it was introduced, rides which were currently open were exempt from needing to have a water treatment system in place. So no issues there.
But here's a question: what is a "new water ride"? Is it a newly built water ride from scratch? Or is it something which (re)opens after this EU rule was put in place? If it's the latter, one can already see how it was problematic for Loggers (which I believe closed after the rule was in place). Be interesting to know what the situation was with the rapids at Drayton, and if that had a water treatment system prior to closure, and if it does now? Might give some indication...
Anyways, the issues with Loggers and a water treatment system is that a water treatment system needs to be closed. So it can't interfere with the lake. Which, for Loggers, would be a mighty big ask logistically.
As for Tidal Wave and other rides listed by Matt, they will have treated water because of the sheer amount of water dumped on you, very much a health and safety type thing there.
I think if a UK park did introduce a new log flume and it wasn't too wet (or had wetness which could be varied depending on the weather), it would certainly be popular, and given the family appeal, would be a more than worthwhile investment in terms of photos and merch too.