OK Ollie (and all others interested), I was not about to go into the whole 360 vs PS3 thing. I merely wanted to point out some of the problems I have with the post you made, primarily with the console interfaces & their online component. Smelly did a fine job, if somewhat sarcastic, but unfortunately it ran over into the 360 vs PS3 thing.
Ollie said:
Home isn't an interface. You still have the XMB for the main menu which is miles better than the stupid Xbox interface.
That is strictly an opinion with no factual basis. I have tried out the PS3 interface and prefer that of the 360, but I'm not going to say that one is better than the other as they are both just an interface (not an operating system).
Ollie said:
Home was also free which is something Microsoft would NEVER do. And the only thing you have to pay for in Home is for "extra" furniture, clothes and houses. But even those are in pence.
Home is free for now, but Sony can't keep losing millions (pounds/dollars - whichever you prefer) and will likely have to change their model once more people like yourself will be willing to shell out cash for the pleasure.
Sony losses $100 for each PS3 sold and must reply on their software to make any sort of profit for the SCEA division. Resistance2, LBP, Gran Turismo, God of War 3 & Killzone 2 will hopefully bring in enough to make that happen by the 3rd quarter of '09, but with the smallest install base of the 3 consoles that might not occur.
Ollie said:
Seriously the only greedy company is Microsoft. They charge you loads for each game.
I don't know about overseas, but here in the States both 360 & PS3 games have the same sticker price. Only Wii games cost less.
Ollie said:
Charge you EVERY YEAR to play online.
The charge is just under $50 for the year to play games online, but all other online features are free. Considering how much better the XBL performance is, I think its money well spent as it helps MS maintain a high quality online service. Plus MS breaks even on every console sold and with MGS bringing out the most successful game franchise in history (Halo) & exclusives like Gears of War, there will be no need to charge more sometime in the future.
As for the debate over which online component is better, you need to look no further than Reggie Fils-Aime's Attack of the Show interview from a couple months ago where he admitted that both Nintendo & Sony have "quite a bit of catching up to do" to reach XBL's performance level.
I can also list numerous posts (including your own) on the troubles Sony has just getting their Home update onto everyone's console and subsequest connection timeouts. The 360 dashboard update (with the avatars, movie streaming & other additions) went off without a hitch and took only a couple of minutes to complete.
Ollie said:
Charge you for updates and it doesn't come with anything built in and they charge you extortionate prices to add them on.
I have never paid for an update for the console or any games (original xbox or the 360). Every game I have purchased comes with 'everything built in', so I don't understand what you are talking about there. Additional add-ons that are later released by MGS & 3rd party manufacturers are not exorbitantly priced and cost the same as said add-ons for the PS3 (Guitar Hero & Rock Band songs for example).
Ollie said:
Yes PS3 has a higher shelf value, but XBOX costs more in the long run.
As Smelly said, not if you have no intention of playing online as there is no additional cost at all for the 360. Even with the extra charge for Gold membership, it would likely take the lifespan of the console for the 360 to reach the initial investment a PS3 will set you back.
All that being said, I still feel - like Smelly - that it's simply a matter of preference. I prefer online first person shooters & the 360 is clearly the better console for that. Others prefer role playing games & the PS3 takes the nod there. But those gaps are narrowing & perhaps one day the playing fields will be level for all types of games.
Having different consoles manufactures is only good for us gamers overall, as competition keeps prices down & games from becoming generic. I hated the Wii when it first launched as I felt that all it had to offer was a gimmick or two (motion sensitive controller & Mii avatars), but although the PS3 motion sensitive controller was a bust, the Mii avatars success clearly influenced both competing consoles for the better.