Ben said:I don't hate Premier... This would be **** if it was made by anyone.
-lofty- said:Intricks said:Ah. They removed them though, so they at least saw the flaw and heard the complaints (possibly) apparently.
You do realise you're not "Switching between the hideouts'..." on that post. Right?
bizarrofan10 said:I don't understand why it has to launch you forward and then backwards before launching you forward a third time to complete its circuit. It it launched you forward first and completed a full circuit off that, then the capacity would be significantly better. Not great, but better.
Ben said:It's just one of the many reasons why this ride is vulgar and offensive.
D1993 said:^ Yes it would be possible, I dont see why not.
However it didnt look like it would do that in the animation, although of course you dont always set in store 100% by what the animation and cgi's show you.
Maybe with the back and forth launching mechanism, it wouldnt work?
If it was possible, I think they should definetly do that.
dropthefloor93 said:The guys at Premier are certainly more capable of designing rides than we are, and they have most certainly realized that capacity will be horrible and have probably found some way to nerf this problem slightly. But they aren't idiots and just pointing out their mistakes really doesn't do much seeing as if they are building a multi million dollar project, they check their flaws. All of them.
The guys at Premier are certainly more capable of designing rides than we are, and they have most certainly realized that capacity will be horrible and have probably found some way to nerf this problem slightly.