D1993 said:^ Isnt the whole ride not going to rise above 40-50 feet?
I dont think a crane issue would really be an issue considering the height of this coaster is very small.
Perhaps it's one of the sections that's going to have a walkway built over it?rollermonkey said:Pretty weird place to start building from.
Must be a crane location issue.
rollermonkey said:Pretty weird place to start building from.
Hixee said:I don't see why this is such a difficult thing that gets brought up all the time.
-lofty- said:D1993 said:^ Isnt the whole ride not going to rise above 40-50 feet?
I dont think a crane issue would really be an issue considering the height of this coaster is very small.
Oh yeah, I forgot, that if a coaster doesn't go above 50ft, it's hoisted in place by the World's Strongest Man Competitors...
Yeah, that was a stupid comment, no matter what height the coaster is, a crane is needed to actually LIFT the pieces in place.
Hixee said:COASTERS ARE BUILT IN THE MOST SENSIBLE ORDER! It's really not hard.
Like Gavin said, they fit together whichever order the pieces are put in in (in theory), so they start when it's most convenient. With big coasters like Leviathan they start with the lift hill because that requires the largest cranes. Obviously, larger cranes are more difficult to manoeuvre in/out of the park, so it makes sense to use them first when there's little else in the way to stop them being able to move.
With this coaster they also need to be able to get the cranes out. Even if they're smaller (because this ride isn't as big) they're still going to be a pain to get out of the construction area as the coaster is smaller and night never be high enough off the ground to let the crane out if it got stuck in the middle. Like Xpress said, this segment they've put in is right at the back of the area where they'd be unable to access it from the other side.
Really, am I just misunderstanding all of you and you all understand this perfectly, or are you all just not reading my posts? :roll:
Again though, you're just proving my point. They try and get the biggest/bulkiest bits done first as they require the largest machinery. The station/transfer track are not only complex pieces of track, but they also need a lot of wiring to be installed (and often theming). It makes sense to get them done first so that electricians and 'themers' can come in and start work. The tricky parts of I305 and Eejanaika will almost certainly have been the least tricky way of doing it. It may have been a hassle, but they wanted the bigger cranes off site ASAP, so they compromised by having to a bit of fiddling later on.rollermonkey said:And from what I've seen, most coasters are actually built in order, either forwards or back, and most typically starting at the station or the transfer track.
And, we've seen several rides over the years that were a tight fit to get the last piece in. I-305 and Eejanaika come to mind immediately with images of the surrounding pieces being pulled apart to squeeze the last one in having been posted online or available via a webcam.
Looks super sexy imo! I wonder how it will ride. Whether it'll be intense like Rita or have more of a family feel (ie slow meandering).
andrus said:^^Well Rita has one initial 60 mph launch. This has several (three?) launches at a slightly lower speed. So could be that the experience is similar I guess we wont know until the ride open!