Screaming Coasters said:
See, I don't really think parks are building these just because they are cheaper. Right now, they are the 'in thing' so everybody wants a piece of it and if a local park can build one for a good price, great! A roller coaster is a roller coaster, no matter who builds it.
Erol, no.
A computer is also a computer, no matter who makes it - yet you'll always tell a person to buy a Mac. Same concept.
The old idea of "you get what you pay for" REALLY does apply. Saw is a POOR quality coaster. And that shows. How often does it actually WORK? Did they have to trim it after one day? Does it still go down every day, like clockwork, for maintenance? (that one is actually a question...) Thorpe can just about get away with that because they have a "unique" client base - ie., idiot chavs who don't notice. BUT, PA is a different park - it's quality, and all the rides are high quality, made by the best people for them - ie., Intamin for a launch, B&M for a looper, Vekoma for a Kiddie, etc. IF PA really HAD to have a 97 degree coaster, they SHOULD be going to Intamin for it, and then they would get the MUCH higher quality version. Hershey and CP did NOT go for a Eurofighter FOR. A. REASON. I do still 110% think Thorpe should have gone to Intamin as well, but, they pissed their budget away on a tacky movie theme, so, that was out the window.
PA is a quality, World Class resort, with hotels coming out their ears, a tacky seaside ride is not what they should be buying. It's only a heartbeat away from them building a Spinning Wild Mouse!