TPoseOnTantrum
Giga Poster
At Fantawild Jining, the Vekoma Top Gun is currently being installed — the ground level sections are completed;
Oh not another one. Every time I see one of these pop up I'm like meh cause it seems like these are becoming the next boomerang in China and they don't look like anything special imo.The Hyper Space Warp for Oriental Heritage in Yingtan has gone vertical.
View attachment 18054
View attachment 18055
Source
I'm sorry I couldn't help myself.Meh theyre decent rides and a million times better than the old Boomerang, Skyloop combos they used to go for in their smaller parks.
Footers for a ride at Fantawild Shangqui is going in but its hard to see what layout it actually is. Its not a Space Warp or Top Gun. First guess is its another Renegate model like Taizhou but hard to tell right now.
View attachment 18057
Track for both this and the junior boomerang rebound model are on site
View attachment 18058
The mind sees what the heart desires, I suppose.
Having ridden several of the layouts now I'm of the personal opinion that the vests do hold these rides back. Airtime and floppy inversions just don't feel as satisfying with more points of contact holding you in position.So I imagine many will correct me/disagree on this, and although I haven't yet ridden any of these new Vekomas, I'm personally finding it hard to be excited by them and I think it's because of the OSTRs? Weird because these layouts look rather nice, almost like they were made using the Euler orientation in Newton2.
I've heard the restraints aren't bad at all, but surely these could all just have lapbars? I don't know, I just picture them restricting some of the airtime, but perhaps somebody who has ridden one can give their thoughts?more
Interesting that you made that last point, I did always think these layouts look very, very refined as you say. I'm assuming you don't get any laterals on most of the new Vekoma coasters you've ridden? The way the transition and curves are profiled looks to me like you wouldn't get any lats at all?Having ridden several of the layouts now I'm of the personal opinion that the vests do hold these rides back. Airtime and floppy inversions just don't feel as satisfying with more points of contact holding you in position.
Interestingly on the layout design point, I've also found that a lot of the track shaping feels too well refined to the point of losing distinction or character. What looks great from afar doesn't actually ride that excitingly, which for me is an even bigger crime.
It could well be that, though I couldn't say for sure at this moment in time. It has been a while.Interesting that you made that last point, I did always think these layouts look very, very refined as you say. I'm assuming you don't get any laterals on most of the new Vekoma coasters you've ridden? The way the transition and curves are profiled looks to me like you wouldn't get any lats at all?
I definitely understand what you are referring to, but I'd also argue that the refined shaping provides the character and distinction. They are inherently distinct because of how refined they are. Ben Bloemendaal certainly has his unique style that is defined by near perfect shaping and extremely fluid maneuvers.Interestingly on the layout design point, I've also found that a lot of the track shaping feels too well refined to the point of losing distinction or character. What looks great from afar doesn't actually ride that excitingly, which for me is an even bigger crime.
I'd be curious to know the reasoning as to why they haven't developed a lapbar-only train. From a manufacturer standpoint, the vests are certainly preferable for safety reasons. However, they are doing lapbar-only trains for the new suspended looping coasters, so they clearly don't have a fundamental issue with doing it.Having ridden several of the layouts now I'm of the personal opinion that the vests do hold these rides back. Airtime and floppy inversions just don't feel as satisfying with more points of contact holding you in position.
You're right, it's definitely a disctinct style. I do appreciate them all for that and don't mean to detract from it. The style just doesn't tick my boxes.I definitely understand what you are referring to, but I'd also argue that the refined shaping provides the character and distinction. They are inherently distinct because of how refined they are. Ben Bloemendaal certainly has his unique style that is defined by near perfect shaping and extremely fluid maneuvers.