Oh the irony! Dreamland ended up in such trouble because, if I recall it correctly, the then owner had successfully applied to have the designation of the site changed to allow residential development, then put forward the plans for the scenic to be stranded in a sea of housing.
The Save Dreamland campaign then kicked in, "saved" the park and got the whole Heritage Park idea going.
And now, just days before the park is due to re-open, it appears that the company taking over the park has the option of, erm, building housing around the scenic if the amusement park fails.
Do I have this correct?