jacoaster said:
And that is exactly what you have to understand. In France it is seen as rude for a staff member to approach someone unless asked, for example. Also, lots of Europeans don't like American-style/Disney-style service. They actually complain about the "fakeness" of American service. This is actually something I love about DLP. If a Cast Member looks like they're enjoying themselves, they really are, it's not fake.
Precisely, so why build the attraction in Paris in the first place. Either way, personally. I prefer the customer service in the American parks. So therefore we differ.
jacoaster said:
Two reasons for that: 1) the park hasn't developed enough yet to fill any "empty" spaces, and 2) Disney parks are not about rides, they about stories and immersive theming. The areas that you mentioned are, despite lack of attractions, very well themed an immersive. :wink:
I didn't say it wasn't very well themed and immersive... I said it was beautiful in fact. I was just pointing out why I thought Marc had put about the empty space.
jacoaster said:
Hollywood Studios was cramped and in my opinion Tower Of Terror and Rock 'n' Roller Coaster, though fun, were not as good as their Parisian counterparts. It wasn't a welcoming park at all.
I will give you that it is a little cramped (very much like the Studios in Paris, with its dead ends and complete lack of anything that can be considered and atmosphere) Studio parks in general tend to all feel the same to me.
Tower of Terror, though, absolutely, 100% pisses all over the Paris version. Without a doubt in my mind. It is the best of the three Twilight Zone towers. The way in which the building is placed on the hill with the queue meandering upto the building is a much better lead in then it being just plonked in the park which it is Paris and California.
Rock N Roller, much of a muchness. Although again, the preshow sections are a much better lead in for the Florida version. I appreciate that the "story" was altered vastly for the fact it was to deal with Europeans having several different languages, but even still, I much prefered the whole lead in during the Florida version.
Pirates, again, we differ. I thought the California version was much better throughout the dungeon queuing and general upkeep of the ride and its animatronics themeselves.
jacoaster said:
The weather in Florida is dreadful.
That is hardly anything that Disney can control though is it and therefore is a totally null point. Plus, I've never had anything but wonderful sunshine and minor afternoon rainshowers every time I have been to Orlando. The said rainshowers last of all of 15 minutes and then 15 minutes after that the sun is back and you would never have believed it rained. Whereas in Paris, I have had only 1 day of sunshine in the 3 multi day trips I have made. The rest of the time it has absolutely pissed it down with rain. Nevertheless, the weather is a mute point as I say. As it is something neither destination can control.
The spread out layout of Orlando is done for a reason though. They want to ensure that, where ever possible, you are unable to see any of the other Disney parks. Plus, like Paris, those big open spaces are also earmarked for further development.
Anywho, either way, we clearly differences in what we look for in terms of the Disney experience and that we have varying degrees of what we have already experienced. I find that California and Orlando, as an overall, are both better then Paris. Each of them have their things that are better and worse, but as an overall, I would much rather visit California and Orlando then Paris anyday.
As a side note, you mention, guests in Florida being rude. Again, I have never really found this and when I have I tend to find that the rude people are actually Brits. Whereas in Paris I have found, on several occasions that people have a complete reluctance to queue like civilised human beings and then when you ask them to stop jumping the line, or try to stop them, they get aggresive. Again, varying experiences, I think.