Should Flamingo Land lget rid of Kumali.

[Smithy]

Except that that makes no sense financially, operationally or even logically.

 

[herbinator]

I have not even been on it yet but it looks awsome,why remove a new(ish) ride! It makes them money.

 

[dj-fireball999]

No.

This topic makes the baby Jesus cry...

 

[Anonymous]

Except that that makes no sense financially, operationally or even logically.

Financially: Having a world class B&M would improve the parks reputation, making more money out of the more guests it would attract.

Operationally: B&M's are better coasters, have better throughput and are from an enthusiasts point of view, more attractive to ride than a SLC

Logically: Its called improving a park by getting better rides, also B&Ms are imo far better than anything else, only Intamin come close to B&M.

:wink:

 

[Dave]

I could fart and it would still be there.

 

[Gavin]

Ok, this has gone on long enough.

This topic is embarrassing, and should have been left alone to die a death months ago.

I'm locking it so that it disappears and can't be revived. Do we really need this to be on the top of the Polls and Opinions section, making us look like a bunch of retards?

Top Gun was melted down for scrap years ago, and even if it wasn't, the idea that Kumali would be removed in order to bring it back is, quite possibly, the single stupidest idea we've had on here for a VERY long time.