CanobieFan
Strata Poster
Ah, yes, a fantastic opportunity to ride a floorless roller coaster at the park that's still home to the original floorless roller coaster.a fantastic opportunity and would provide a new experience for the park.
Ah, yes, a fantastic opportunity to ride a floorless roller coaster at the park that's still home to the original floorless roller coaster.a fantastic opportunity and would provide a new experience for the park.
I literally forgot there's a floorless coaster at Great Adventure already, my oversightAh, yes, a fantastic opportunity to ride a floorless roller coaster at the park that's still home to the original floorless roller coaster.
Ah, yes, a fantastic opportunity to ride a floorless roller coaster at the park that's still home to the original floorless roller coaster.
Now something is definitely going on with Ka, especially with the markers.
Yes, Kingda Ka being removed would be because of new site prep needed for a new attraction.I know Six Flags Great Adventure has a lot of coasters, but won’t losing two headline coasters, including an arguable park icon, at once have a massive impact? I hope they have replacements planned in some capacity, as these two going, particularly Kingda Ka, could leave a considerable hole.
Not as much as you'd think - relocations typically hover ~$4-6M depending on size and scale, which is still at least half the going rate for new coaster installations of similar size ($12-$15M). Let's not forget Green Lantern itself is a relocation, done on the same merit.Maybe I'm crazy, but wouldn't relocating and getting new trains for GL cost almost as much as a new coaster? Maybe not a new, full-sized B&M, but a coaster from elsewhere, or a compact B&M dive/invert. And these floorless conversions haven't yielded much for the parks that get them, nor are they particularly well-liked at any park that has one. (Rougarou has mixed reception at best, while Patriot and Firebird are looked down on).
Why spend the cash on careful disassembly, shipping, rebuilding, and new trains, when for just a little extra (relatively speaking) you could get a brand new coaster, with a full lifespan ahead of it, that would likely be better received by parkgoers?
You say that, but I would gladly bet there are many second and third-tierThink we're past the point where we're going to see these huge less desirable coasters get passed down to a smaller park in the chain, particularly when the American parks have suddenly begun embracing higher quality and customized products. More of a bang-for-your buck scenario and better value than some aging relocated B&M. That was a very 1990's-2000's-era mindset and Green Lantern isn't exactly in its prime now.
@Fiender probably said it better but I'll elaborate. Resurgent investments like Bobcat at Six Flags Great Escape, Iron Menace at Dorney Park, Zambezi Zinger at Worlds of Fun (mechanically issues aside), and Rookie Racer at Six Flags St Louis have all been incredibly successful, well-implemented, and well-received. Much better than any relocated hand-me-down at those parks would have/has historically done.
The only theory I can come up with on why they would actually close Ka quietly is maybe they would redo it. Switch out the hydraulic launch for magnetic, and then extend the layout into where a Green Lantern is, which is the reason for GL's removal/ relocation. Thus extending the life of Kingda Ka under a new launch system, not losing a major crowd pleasing coaster, not losing the Kilimanjaro drop towers and then freeing up extra space to add an additional attraction down the line in what's left Green Lantern plot. And Maybe this is why it's happening all so fast because of the TT2 issues and maybe it could be Intamin because of how the other didn't work out? Eeeeh just a fun theory I had.
With all due respect, in what world would TT2 not opening as intended due to unforeseen issues caused by the conversion make CF shutdown KK faster and without any announcement?And Maybe this is why it's happening all so fast because of the TT2 issues and maybe it could be Intamin because of how the other didn't work out?
How so?Since it looks like some kind of decision has been made (with all the markers), does this mean we can at least rule Zamperla out?
Because, Zamperla doesn't use survey markers?Since it looks like some kind of decision has been made (with all the markers), does this mean we can at least rule Zamperla out?
I'm seriously debating on flying up there myself next weekend. 1500 miles for me. I kept saying there's just no way they close it forever and not say anything??? But the rumors keep piling. I'm definitely spooked, I've been wanting to go since 2005 but have never had the chance, don't want to risk it and regret it.I'm thinking of trying to get there this week/weekend, just in case... Ka's demise would leave a big hole in my bucket list!
But, it's 3500 miles away. Can't decide if that's dedication or insanity (esp. as nothing is confirmed. Got a bad feeling though)
Well, on the contrary if anything Zamperla would be the favorite to convert KK, if there was a conversion planned, as they should by now have the best understanding of what needs to done.Because they wouldn't try with Zamperla already since they havent fixed TTD2.
I'm seriously debating on flying up there myself next weekend. 1500 miles for me. I kept saying there's just no way they close it forever and not say anything??? But the rumors keep piling. I'm definitely spooked, I've been wanting to go since 2005 but have never had the chance, don't want to risk it and regret it.