Rate the Sig and Avatar - II

[nealbie]

Someone's forgetting who supported who last year...

6/10

 

[Pokemaniac]

Random. And your name is not capitalized properly.

Though, I kinda like it. 8/10

 

[kimahri]

UGUUGUGUUUUGH

S'alright 7/10

 

[jokerman]

I like the design very much, but I havn't a clue what it is, so 8/10.

 

[Nemesis Inferno]

You have a duck...

Ducks are alright...

7/10

 

[AJ]

6/10 - ava

8/10 - sig

Something missing =/

 

[nealbie]

Edit - AGH! Gaga!

4/10 (all 4 points are for AJ )

 

[AJ]

-2/10.

 

[Anonymous]

Haha, not bad at all.

Does anyone here do Sigs & Avatars? I'm new and my profile is looking very plain to say the least!

 

[RCF]

Advertisements.

Rach: http://www.coasterforce.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12700

Ollie: http://www.coasterforce.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21497

 

[Ollie]

Ava: 7/10 Nice shot but too zoomed out.
Sig: 9/10 Almost perfect. Just the colour seems a bit washed out and faded.

 

[nealbie]

Brad based times are always fun - 9/10 though due to lack of 'Brad' on the sig

 

[Ollie]

Ava: 7/10 I can see balloons but not sure what it's meant to be showing me.
Sig: 7/10 Nicely merged together although your name doesn't have a capital N.

 

[Rush]

6/10 for both. Saw is SO 2009.

 

[Dave]

It was a fun game, so i'll give 8/10 for both.

 

[Daniel Bill Kent]

I don't support/like Portsmouth FC so 4/10?

 

[Brookes]

Don't really match but 9/10 for the ava as Peter Griffin is a legend and 7/10 for the sig nice shots there.

 

[Anonymous]

The Avatar and Signature are quite smart together, however this is a rollercoaster site and they're pretty irrelivant, so 7/10.

 

[RCF]

^Just because it's a roller coaster site doesn't mean he HAS to have roller coasters. The Winter Olympics occurred a little bit less than a month ago..... :wink:

Sig: 0 since there is none but I do love Yogi Bear so 8/10 for the Ava.

 

[Waffleman]

^Nice, consistent, and very good photos

And how can Yogiie say that someones avatar has nothing to do with rollercoasters and is therefore bad?