Me neither, it's pretty mad. But then I remember the short layout with it's low throughput potential and it becomes a little more believable, still stoked though.
I might be blind but where does it say WI-R anywhere?
Yeah I'm blind, I didn't see the I after the W.
Do you know why Da Vinci was ‘WI-Q‘ when according to RCDB it was the 16th wing coaster to be built, which would be make it ‘WI-P’? Also do you have some form of spreadsheet for each ride and it’s model number?
What have you done…Also do you have some form of spreadsheet for each ride and it’s model number?
Do you know why Da Vinci was ‘WI-Q‘ when according to RCDB it was the 16th wing coaster to be built, which would be make it ‘WI-P’? Also do you have some form of spreadsheet for each ride and it’s model number?
Unfortunately you made a little mistake.I mean of course I do.
View attachment 18814
Wing Coasters being one of the few we have every model designation for so far.
As for the disconnect between DaVinci ride being Q and also 16th. L was a ride that got some way through the design process but never happened for whatever reason. Unfortunatly no idea where it was going.
Edit: The image above originally had a gap for K and L - Have just found an image to confirm WI-K is Chongqing's Flying Wing Coaster confiming WI-L was the one never built. Edited post accordingly.
rest of the sheet is here
B&M Serial Numbers
docs.google.com
I think they tend to wait until ride hardware shows up on-site.
Europa Park's new coaster is on RCDB though, despite no ride hardware being on that site either
Europa have announced theirs, though, whereas Chessington haven’t… I think RCDB’s rule is either an announcement or ride hardware on site.Europa Park's new coaster is on RCDB though, despite no ride hardware being on that site either
Of course not, but there's no harm in people discussing it, it's a forum after all.
