Can an LSM or LIM launch break speed records?UC said:Where did all this talk about "an initial hydraulic launch followed by LSM launches" come up?
Not really, but I was just going by this because Mike always seems to know what he's talking about.UC said:Does it matter?
Mike T said:This will be the Fastest and Longest roller coaster in the Southeastern United States - yes that means we're going after Intimidator's records.
We were talking 75mph plus to be faster that Timmy & I know Mavvy only does 70mph, so even though I didn't know about iSpeed (which doesn't quite reach 75mph) I still think my question was legit. I'll take your word for it that a LSM launch can reach speeds near 80mph or better, but what I'd like to know is if they can work like the second LIM launch on Speed - The Ride or Volcano? It would be a shame if this coaster would have to slow down like Maverick does for the additional launches.UC said:To sum it up, Jerry's question about the feasibility of the LSM system to break speed records would've certainly been a valid one - had he not forgotten about how fast iSpeed and Maverick launch :lol:.
UC said:For example, while LIM could certainly be used to achieve a speed record, it should be noted that even after years and years of building coasters with the LIM system, we've yet to find a way to make them go very fast without chewing up an unrealistic amount of juice to do so.
Course its better than when it first came out. If you go by average acceleration rates, then the 1.2g launch of iSpeed is a marked improvement than the 0.64g launch of TOT/Superman.While I agree (to an extent, given the speeds we're discussing) with your assessment of LSMs in this case, it should be noted that it's a bit presumptive to assume that just because we've had a system for X number of years doesn't mean it's necessarily any better or worse than when it first came out.
So it was you that first drew the "presumptive" comparison between "early-generation" systems and what we have today :wink:that early-generation LSM system isn't exactly the most efficient or reliable around...
If current surges are still an issue for a park, there is no reason why an Incredible Hulk style launch power system couldn’t be used (which incidentally uses Rotary Induction Motors). Indeed I believe that’s one advantage and clinching factor for many parks in buying hydraulic launch systems, as the hydraulic pumps are always turning and drawing a constant current.
I never thought of the possibility of a wing walker before! A huge ground hugging layout without tight turns/inversions and with a launch, this sure could be intamins second wing walker beeing installed at bgt!Pokemaniac said:Also, I take it WingWalkers are out of the question? It's only feasible if those S-curves in upper left are taken really slowly. Thinking about it, even then the stress on the outer seats would be quite big. And regardless, who wants to guess how much energy you need to launch such a heavy train thrice during once circuit?