bizarrofan10 said:
Some crap that I could barely be bothered to read, but since it was all aimed directly at me, here we go...
First of all, it's all just opinion. I just happen to base my opinions on personal experience, quite a lot of experience at that (yeah, that sounds dickish, but it's true), rather than height/speed statistics or extremely flawed polls.
bizarrofan10 said:
No way. Millennium Force is better than Goliath
I said I really liked Millenium Force. I liked it a lot, despite the vast majority of reviews I hear about it saying something along the lines of "it's a great drop, but that's it." See? There's that personal opinion thing I mentioned earlier.
I also said that I could fully understand why people would prefer MF over Goliath. It's not like I said
anywhere that there's anything wrong with MF, so you really don't need to be so defensive about it.
bizarrofan10 said:
NO WAY NO WAY NOOOOOOOOOOO. no way. Completely disagree. now you're just ripping CP off. Raptor takes it.
It would serve me no purpose whatsoever to "rip CP off". You like Raptor. Great. I didn't. In fact it's my least favourite B&M invert. That's from a list of twelve by the way. Compared to the other "big" inverts, it's piss poor. I only rate the Batman clones slightly higher, if that's any comfort to you, but higher nonetheless.
bizarrofan10 said:
Wicked Twister.......you mean the tallest and fastest impulse coaster in the world.
Yes, I mean the tallest and fastest impulse coaster in the world. It's also the roughest (that I've ridden) and the most monotonous (look it up). The impulse coasters with one twisted and one straight spike, in my opinion, are better simply because they offer more variety. The few extra feet don't make a blind bit of difference. I find a straight, vertical drop a lot more exciting.
bizarrofan10 said:
Maverick...........you mean the coaster that won the coasterforce air time awards for #1 in the US
Yeah. Didn't I just say it was a very, very good coaster? I don't rate it as highly as a lot of people (there's me and one of my pesky opinions again; I should probably change that since, you know, it's won an internet forum award and everything), but it's still a very good coaster. Again, why so defensive; it's not like I said there was anything wrong with it.
bizarrofan10 said:
They're just suspended coasters, made for intermediate thrill seekers, not enthusiasts like us. they don't even count.
A few people have already pointed out some excellent suspended coasters. Since you're such a fan of using poll results and statistics to tell me why I'm wrong, you might want to look at this:
http://www.ushsho.com/steelrollercoasterpollresults2009.htm
Look at number two. That's right, according to that poll (by the way, if you're going to throw poll results around, that's by far the most accurate one), a suspended coaster was voted the
number 2 steel coaster in the world last year. Not just the number 2 suspended. Not just the number 2 in Korea, or even Asia. The
second best steel coaster in the world.
Oh and "not made for enthusiasts like us"? No coaster is made for enthusiasts like us. Get over yourself.
bizarrofan10 said:
Magic Mountain has better coasters, but Cedar Point is the waaaaaaaay better park.....don't disrespect
So, you've admitted that Magic Mountain has better coasters, but this is after your extremely scientific points scoring system awarded Cedar Point's coasters 5 points over Magic Mountain's 2 points. How does that work exactly?
As for the "don't disrespect" comment. Forgetting for a moment that we're not in an episode of Jersey Shore, show me where I "disrespected" Cedar Point. I said I had a great time there. I said I'd like to go back. I just said I had a better time at Magic Mountain.
It's ridiculous fanboys who can't look at any discussion in an objective way, and who look for an "attack" where there isn't one, that actually do more harm to the parks that they think they're defending.
I actually want to dislike Cedar Point now.