andrus said:Yes, I don't think location should be ignored as a factor. When I visited both Alton and Thorpe last year I only got to spend 6 hours at Alton due to it's bad location (takes forever to get there with public transportation) while I spent 10 hours at Thorpe which I think was one of the major contributing factors to why I had a better time at ThorpeMartyn B said:andrus said:It's just that Alton is set really far away and hard to get to
So one of your reasons for Thorpe being a better theme park is that Alton is hard to get to...?
I can understand 6 hours being an issue with Alton, but 10 hours at Thorpe is like 10 hours of Chinese water torture. I'm usually ready to slit my wrists after about an hour at Thorpe. It's just so "meh".
A theme park is about everything, not just how many rides you can cram into the day (IMO). A theme park is about having a day where you enjoy yourself, taking yourself away from the norm (and getting in a few rides while you're at it).
Busch Williamsburg doesn't have a great number of rides, but it's just a superb place to hang around and enjoy being removed from the world. Alton is along the same line. Thorpe? It's like a shopping mall... Crowded, bland and doesn't really offer anything you can't find elsewhere...