Jarrett
Most Obnoxious Member 2016
Top 5:This was a great read and I thank you for sharing your opinion. May I ask what are the three manufacturers you rank above B&M? (Not including RMC)
RMC
Gravity Group
Intamin
GCI
B&M
Top 5:This was a great read and I thank you for sharing your opinion. May I ask what are the three manufacturers you rank above B&M? (Not including RMC)
This.If I had to pick one to ride right now.. well my Top 10 says it all. If I was building a park and wanted to build one? B&M without question. Business wise, they make more sense, which is why they've been successful.
This.
While I am fully on the RMC train, I am a self confessed Intamin fanboy, but I wouldn't put either into a park as a crowd puller immediately. B&Ms are solid investments with minimal downtime, they offer most styles of coaster and can absolutely munch through people.
I'll be interested to see if they up their game in the airtime department though, an ejector machine from B&M could be glorious.
Is this an assertion or a question? I think one would need to explain why Intamin in particular shouldn't be included and possibly also Mack who pound-for-pound manage to make arguably some of the strongest rides going.
I get what you're saying, but I'd argue that in a ''pound-for-pound" kind of way, Mack are up there. Their stuff isn't the most expensive or the most extreme in terms of stats, but they're of extremely consistent quality, which I'd argue many manufacturers aren't.I've come to the opinion over time that the Mack coaster selection isn't quite as "world class" as many enthusiasts make out to be, just removing Helix from the equation vastly changes that dynamic... not saying the others are :emoji_poop: but Helix pins that whole argument together.
I get what you're saying, but I'd argue that in a ''pound-for-pound" kind of way, Mack are up there. Their stuff isn't the most expensive or the most extreme in terms of stats, but they're of extremely consistent quality, which I'd argue many manufacturers aren't.
mMack.