Whenever there's an ride accident, sirens and flashing lights go off in nearly every news room. The sensationalism meter bursts through the roof and the press start to dig further for bad news. It's almost as if they think they are doing a public service by reminding people how "unsafe" rides can be.
A few years ago, The Big One at Blackpool derailed. It happened again a few months later at the same spot and CF just so happened to be there. Unashamedly I contacted several media outlets because a) I wanted to get CF's name in the paper and b) I consider it news. Anyway, a chap from a daily national newspaper called me straight back and the first thing he asked was "Is anybody hurt?". I said no. He then said it wasn't of interest. I suppose "SIX HURT IN BIG DIPPER CRASH" is better for the papers than "BIG DIPPER DERAILS".
I am aware that some newspapers/news programmes do try to balance out a report by explaining the safety features etc but, on the whole, they only seem to care about the sensational side of it.
What I want to know is are people - casual riders, the "general public" - put off by these reports? Is there any hard evidence to suggest that people stop visiting parks because of a high profile ride break down or a rare fatal accident?
I think most people are sensible enough to understand that accidents/break down are rare and it won't affect their decsion to visit a park. Do you think parks suffer due to high profile accidents?
A few years ago, The Big One at Blackpool derailed. It happened again a few months later at the same spot and CF just so happened to be there. Unashamedly I contacted several media outlets because a) I wanted to get CF's name in the paper and b) I consider it news. Anyway, a chap from a daily national newspaper called me straight back and the first thing he asked was "Is anybody hurt?". I said no. He then said it wasn't of interest. I suppose "SIX HURT IN BIG DIPPER CRASH" is better for the papers than "BIG DIPPER DERAILS".
I am aware that some newspapers/news programmes do try to balance out a report by explaining the safety features etc but, on the whole, they only seem to care about the sensational side of it.
What I want to know is are people - casual riders, the "general public" - put off by these reports? Is there any hard evidence to suggest that people stop visiting parks because of a high profile ride break down or a rare fatal accident?
I think most people are sensible enough to understand that accidents/break down are rare and it won't affect their decsion to visit a park. Do you think parks suffer due to high profile accidents?