What's new
FORUMS - COASTERFORCE

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Universal to get LOTR theme park rights

nadroJ

CF Legend
OK, so it's not 100% confirmed, but word going around says that they've pretty much got it in the bag.

My thoughts are that if anybody should do it, it's Universal, but I just don't know how it would translate? The film is full of shots of vast rolling landscapes, giant ancient metropolises and generally grand structures. Everything would obviously have to be miniaturised, and I can't help but think that this would compromise the effect and style of the LOTR world.

And what would there even be rides of?
 
I'm just wondering where they will build it, both parks are short of space.

This could see the end of that whole area to the left I.e t2 ET and everything in between. Lets face it that whole section is quiet empty of attractions.
 
^The kids area that E.T. is in seems to be pretty much confirmed for a re-theme in a couple of years, considering that's been known about for a while I can't see them changing their minds and making it the spot for LOTR.

I'm not a fan of LOTR and I can see where the love of the visuals come from (same as Avatar) but I just can't see how it'll work in a theme park environment unless it was maybe it's own entire park which obviously Universal doesn't have the land for.

Maybe it'll just be a new 3D style attraction to take over from Terminator? (although I'll be mega upset the day that goes and yes I know they've just closed the one in Hollywood)
 
Tbh I did not know they were going to re theme the kids area. I am not the greatest fan of the park so I do not really follow it.

I hope it's not just a 4d show but I don't see what else it can be as people have said.

If they theme an area it could clash with the potter stuff, plus it would take about 2 years to make when a film could be done in months.
 
Who says this is going to be for a park in the USA, or for a park that's already built? Who even says its to do with a theme park? Could be to do with another film...
 
marc said:
If they theme an area it could clash with the potter stuff, plus it would take about 2 years to make when a film could be done in months.
I don't quite get that about the comparison between a Theme Park area and them just making a movie? Because you could say the EXACT same about the whole Potter Construction.

Let's face it, LOTR has a HUGE following, as does Potter. Potter has done so well being put into a park scenario, why won't LOTR? As stated above, there's also no saying that it's going to the Orlando park, it could go to ANY of them, apart from Tokyo which is extremely limited on space, unless they also spite their Jaws ride.
 
What I mean is right now they are building the potter stuff and it's a huge project and won't be complete for sometime.

If they want a Lord of the Rings attraction a 4d film will take months not years to create.

Yes it could go anywhere, I was just assuming it would be Orlando 1st.
 
^ With all the stuff that's going on at the Orlando resort, I wouldn't have thought this will be going there just yet.
 
If I took a guess, I think the firs park to feature anything of the sort would actually be Singapore. But still, this is all years away, dependant on if Universal even manage to get the rights to it.
 
I take back what I said. According to Screamscape, this could be heading to Islands of Adventure, as replacment for Toon Lagoon.
 
I love LotR just as much as any other single 22 year old boy, but, I would cut a bitch if it replaced Toon Lagoon.

Singapore it'd REALLY fit in actually. Well, by the looks of it.
 
As usual, we're practically booking flights without actually bothering to look at the source material.

Universal have approached the Tolkien estate, who are notoriously dickish with the rights to his stuff, through Warner Brothers, with an idea. And even that much is "someone heard through someone else".

That's it.
 
I'm going out on a limb here, but I say Potter is way easier to put in a theme park than LOTR.

Harry Potter would have been awesome even without Potter. The setting is half the charm of the series. It's a functional society with its own rules, stories and traditions. Atmospheric places with mysteries and quirks around every corner. Harry & co. are inhabitants of that world, but they do by no means define it. When reading the books, you get a distinct feeling that the Potterverse would go on as usual, even without Potter in it. It's a place any teenager would love to be a part of, even if none of the characters were in it. And above all, it all takes place in a world so similar to ours that is practially is ours, just with magic items here and there.

Lord of the Rings is... well, it's a little mishmash, really. You have the hobbits of the Shire. The dwarves in their mountains, the elves in the forests. The orcs in the gloomy-doomy-lands. The men everywhere else. On their own, these societies are exciting and fun, but it's not LOTR until everything acts toghether. The story is the most important, where a couple of characters from every little sub-society get together and go on a grand adventure. The world as we see it revolves around those characters. Apart from our group of hero travellers, the world is extremely heterogeneous. Elves play with elves, dwarves play with dwarves, and any member of either race is unlikely to meet any of the others. They are confined to their own lands, where their rules apply and everybody else are intruders. The orcs only show up to create trouble for the others. And the story of the books involves our characters travelling from one society to another.

How would you encorporate these settings in a theme park? For Harry Potter, it's easy. Take your average British village, turn the architecture up to 11, and add a few magic thingies. Boom, your main street is complete. The merchandise practically sells itself. As for any attraction, build it in a dungeon, add magic, and you're done. Your guests are in Harry Potter land. It might not be as easy as that to pull off, but conceptually, it's not a very big problem.

As for LOTR... what do you do? Where do you start? It's well established that all the sub-societies exist far away from the others, with lots and lots of scenic wilderness between. If you create an Elvish village, you can't have dwarves next door. It's firmly established that they hate each other anyway. If you want to go the safe route and create a setting of Men, well, there goes almost everything else. Involve the orcs, and all you can show is fighting. Peaceful coexistence between races is only shown in places where it's a day's ride or two between the settlements. If you want to create a believeable Middle-Earth setting, you have to focus on one race (hobbits, elves, dwarves, men, orcs) and forget all the others, or make a huge land where all the races exist in clearly separated areas, with as little co-interaction as possible (never mind the different architectural styles). There is some overlapping, where both Dwarves and Goblins live in the mountains, and there could be elven forests near the Hobbit villages, but it's somewhat hard to pull off.
On their own, neither of the races truly "are" LOTR, but when they act together, they aren't either. The story is all about the voyage between all the places, and is very hard to capture in a single location.
 
Back
Top