What's new

Six Flags Over Texas joins lawsuit against Gerstlauer

ECG

East Coast(er) General
Staff member
Administrator
Six Flags Over Texas has joined the lawsuit against Gerstlauer in New Texas Giant death case.
Six Flags claims the Texas Giant train involved in a fatal accident in July was a “defective product that was unreasonably dangerous in design, manufacture, distribution and promotion."

Rosa Esparza, a 52-year-old grandmother, died instantly when she fell from the roller coaster. Her family is suing Six Flags and Gerstlauer Amusement Rides, the German firm that made the roller coaster trains.

Arnd von Waldow, an attorney representing Gerstlauer, said he was surprised Six Flags blamed Esparza’s death on the company in a court filing Friday. He said Six Flags was not a passive customer.

“This roller coaster was built according to the specific design specifications and was reviewed, tested and approved by Six Flags,” von Waldow said. “Six Flags was intimately involved in the design and production of this roller coaster. ... Six Flags had this designed exactly the way Six Flags wanted it to be designed.”

The Arlington amusement park’s allegations against the ride company don't signal the end of the Texas Giant.

A Six Flags spokeswoman wrote in an email that the ride is safe after additions, including seat belts, were made after the accident.

“We reopened the ride last fall following the addition of incremental and overlapping safety measures that included redesigned restraint-bar pads from the manufacturer and new seat belts,” spokeswoman Sharon Parker wrote. “The Texas Giant is safe to ride, and we look forward to opening the park for our 2014 season next week."

The original Texas Giant, a record-setting wooden roller coaster, opened at Six Flags in 1990. It closed after two decades and was rebuilt as a steel hybrid roller coaster.

The park closed the renovated ride for about two months last summer for an internal investigation and redesign. In addition to seat belts, lap bar pads were added before the ride reopened in September.

Von Waldow blamed Esparza's death on the failure of Six Flags to follow safety procedures. He pointed to witness statements in the police investigation saying that it appeared Esparza’s lap bar was too high.

If the lap bar is touching the rider’s abdomen and legs, there isn't a danger of the person falling out, von Waldow said.

He said the ride maker has photos of Six Flags engineers in Germany hanging upside down from a roller coaster train exactly like the one involved in the Texas Giant fatality.

“If they followed these procedures, this accident never would have happened,” von Waldow said.

Esparza fell 75 feet from the roller coaster train in the opening moments of the ride.

In Friday’s court filing, Six Flags says it “followed all of the recommended operation and maintenance procedures on the ride as set forth by ... [Gerstlauer] and believe they met the standard of care with regard to the inspection, maintenance and operation of the ride.”

After the accident, test seats were installed at the entrance to the Texas Giant so riders can see whether they will fit safely in the trains. When the ride reopened, Six Flags said in a written statement that “guests with unique body shapes or sizes may not fit into the restraint system.”

An early deposition in this lawsuit questioned whether Esparza’s larger size should have raised questions about the fit of the lap bar.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/loca...t.ece?1392737278940&refer=self&nclick_check=1
 
Does this mean there is a strong evidence that the Gerstaluer trains fail safe failed?

From the hearsay I've heard, the accident was caused by an overweight woman who fell out due to natural forces and a ride op allowing her to ride. The trains operated correctly. It's pure and simple.
 
Gerstlauer filed a countersuit against Six Flags Over Texas. Can't say that this wasn't expected.

'Texas Giant' Builder Blames Six Flags in Death
The German manufacturer of the Texas Giant at Six Flags over Texas is blasting the amusement park.
In a cross-complaint filed in the case involving the death of a Dallas woman, Gerstlauer Amusement Rides said the park is solely to blame for the accident.
On July 19th, Rosy Esparza got on the Texas Giant and soon after plummeted to her death.
In the new court document, Gerstlauer said, "Six Flags failed to exercise reasonable care in their hiring, training and supervision of the ride operators... on the date of the accident."
Specifically adding, “…by not activating the Emergency Stop button at their fingertips when a Six Flags employee observed... Esparza's lap bar was 'too high' as the train left…"
Attorney Frank Branson, representing the Esparza family, said interviews with employees show that one of the workers operating the ride “had a button that could have stopped and should have stopped the ride,” but that button was not pressed.
The German maker also said Six Flags had a hand in designing the ride. Six Flags has blamed the death on a dangerous, defective ride.
Gerstlauer Amusement Rides said the park “expressly designed and specified in writing that there be no seat belts.”
Soon after the accident, seat belts were added, and there was a test seat put out, so people could see if they could safely get on the ride. Gerstlauer Amusement Rides said that seat was provided for the park two years prior to the accident, but never used.
Six Flags over Texas responded to the countersuit.
“The manufacturer assured Six Flags that the Texas Giant, without seat belts, was safe for riders. As an additional safety measure, when the ride re-opened in September, we added incremental and overlapping safety measures including re-designed restraint bar pads and new seat belts. The safety of our guests is our number one priority,” said Six Flags over Texas spokesperson Sharon Parker.
*The headline and lead is incorrect. Gerstlauer built the trains, not the coaster.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/texas-giant-builder-blames-six-flags-death-n46666
 
Talk about pass the blame.

This springs to mind:

tumblr_mj24s6gVUT1s559c9o1_500.gif
 
If these get to court, it's going to get nasty.

And you know the only reason it's gotten this far is the family must be telling 6F to shove whatever settlement offers have been made, because parks NEVER want to go to court.
 
This seat belt thing is nothing new. Rage has them as does speed but Saw does not to speed up throughout.

Sorry but if a park saw no belts they would surly only do this if the manufacturer says it's safe not not have them.

As for a test seat, how does that help? If the restraint goes down and locks then it should not throw anyone out.

As yes can see this getting nasty, it already is.

But I can see Gler getting the blame on this one.

Not sure how the park is at fault, they locked the restraint, it never done it's job.
 
^Do NTG or IRat have test seats? If not, I can see it being a big part of the settlement, as it's something that would have, unfortunately, saved a life in this case.
 
Why would it have though?

The person got on the train and the restraint locked, well from what I read it did.

Test seats do not even lock, they are just trying to get themselves out if it.

All a test seat does is stop people queuing who do not need to and for birds to **** on.

I cannot seat not having a test seat influencing this at all tbh.
 
dick758 said:
Could see this ending up like last time when sfmm sued arrow could this be the end of gerst.

No, it'll go against the park I think. Read Gerstlauer's counter suit, it's pretty clear that the issue was with the operatives.

If Gerstlauer have said "do a, b, c, d and then e to ensure a safe dispatch and if it doesn't look right 'HIT STOP!'" then they can't do any more if SF didn't do that. SF must have agreed to those operating procedures, and it's just negligence at the operator end.

It's not guaranteed, but if you read the Gerstlauer counter suit, it's pretty damning...
 
Forgive my ignorance of US (Texas?) law, but would a case like this go to a jury or would it just see a Judge? I think that would play a pretty big part on how it played out in court.
 
Top